“Hey, honey. You want a number?” she whispers as she waves you over into the shadows of her world.
“A very nice number it is, too.” She giggles lowly into her hand. “Not too much, not too little. Just enough to let your night fly right.”
You pull back.
She tugs you closer, her words now dripping into your mind like warm honey. “Want to see?” she purrs.
You can’t resist.
She smiles as she knows she’s won, and gently tilts your head up to the small ticker of numbers lighting her dark, dark sky.
You look and see…
Your world grays out for a tick and the woman at your arm disappears.
Was she ever really there?
Admittedly, I have no excuse for whatever that was. Apologies seem so trite after that, but you have them. Do with them as you wish. Just know that 3,022 words of my “Lion & Steed” novel were checked, re-checked, buffed and shined today! A whole twenty-two words over my self-imposed minimum. I’ll take it.
Now, I will turn you over to the Chloe Review, an escape for us all from the big ticker in the sky.
The Particulars: “Dracula 3D” or “Argento’s Dracula” is an Italian horror movie released in 2012. Filmed in Piedmont, Italy, the film was written and directed by Dario Argento. The budget was 5.6 million euros.
The Chloe Blurb: A take on Bram Stoker’s novel finds Harker arriving at Dracula’s for a job as his librarian. Wives begin jumping out of the woodwork and fangs are passed around like ghoulish favors. Mina and Lucy are soon roped into the game, as is dear old Van Helsing. It’s a frightful time in ol’ Transylvania that night.
The Players: No major problems here, although the man playing the priest was not up to snuff with the rest of the crew. Lucy, played by Asia Argento, I really liked, although I don’t have the foggiest idea as to why. Screen presence, perhaps? Or maybe the look of the actress simply fit the part as I’ve always imagined it. It probably didn’t hurt her screen time to have her father as the director. Rutger Hauer as Van Helsing bothered me. Not because of the job he did, but because I think the role just didn’t suit the actor. I don’t know. It was weird.
On the Plot: The major plot points were taken straight from Bram Stoker’s novel. If you know the basic Dracula story, you know this film. Nothing new here. I will leave any complaints I have with it to the “Plot Holes” section below.
Plot Holes, Miscues and the Like: Spoilers abound here. Beware.
-The priest’s role in the film was forced. It was like Argento thought he had to have the priest in there to be loyal to the story. Erasing the Father from the script, in my opinion, would have been a better move.
-Mina seemed terribly unaffected by things that should have destroyed such an innocent soul as we are all to believe she is. Examples of this bland reaction include, in no particular order: Lucy’s graphic burning, the giant bug eating Lucy’s father, hearing of her dear Jonathan’s death. The fact that she was seduced by a vampire didn’t seem to bother her too much either.
-Why didn’t Dracula just kill Harker outright? Dracula wasn’t using him and he didn’t even have the poor guy out of his coffin running around causing mayhem and murder like he had poor Tonya doing.
-In the final fight, why didn’t Dracula just knock off Van Helsing’s head like he did the guy that was going to betray him at the town meeting? One knock is all it took.
-Very Hammer-like in the colors, sets and the way the story was told but when viewing it without its 3D-ness, the backgrounds suffered terribly.
And so this ends tonight’s Chloe Review. Hope you enjoyed!